A TECHNO-ECONOMIC NEWS MAGAZINE FOR MEDICAL PLASTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
Our 22nd Year of Publication
Page  6 of 8

Cover Story

Biocompatibility Testing Of Medical Devices: The Manufacturer’s Perspective

risks. As regards prior use data, once again the site and duration of exposure of the new device compared to the prior use should be kept in mind. These data provide either an estimate of risk in line with Clause 4.4 of EN/ISO 14971 or a measure of the acceptability of risks in line with Clause 4.5, respectively.

Acceptable results from appropriate biological tests, of the sort described in the EN/ISO 10993 series of standards, may give a degree of reassurance that the risk of adverse reactions occurring during clinical use is low. EN/ISO 10993-1 indicates evaluation tests which can form a framework for the development of an assessment programme. These tests, commonly termed biocompatibility tests, differ from basic toxicity tests in that they typically attempt to mimic the conditions of clinical exposure to medical devices and thus provide an indication of the probability of adverse effects arising during use. They tend, as a result, to be less sensitive than basic toxicity tests and are thus a less discriminating indicator of risk. Biocompatibility test data should therefore be used to complement an assessment based on materials characterisation, rather than as a replacement for it.

It may not be necessary to perform tests suggested by the standard in all cases. Where the proposed materials have already been extensively used or tested, little or no biological testing may be necessary to judge the biological safety of the device. Conversely, the need for additional tests such as mutagenicity or metabolism studies should be considered on a case by case basis. National laws may prohibit unnecessary animal tests and the need for testing should always be judged in relation to the predictive value of the test and animal welfare considerations.

At GLR we offer comprehensive program of biological safety assessments, literature search, identify data gaps and biocompatibility testing. Our scientists have extensive experience in risk assessment and safety evaluation of all classes of medical device and can offer expert advice on how to go about testing of medical devices.

We are providing some basic information on biocompatibility ie., classification of medical devices. These information will be very useful when placing biocompatibility tests. Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions.

CLASSIFICATION OF DEVICE BASED ON SITE OF CONTACT
Surface Device Skin Gloves, ECG electrodes, Adhesive tapes, Bandages and Monitors.
Mucous membrane Contact lenses, Catheters, Sigmoidoscope, Colonoscope, Gastroscope, Endotracheal tubes, Bronchoscopes, some dental prostheses, some Orthodontic devices, Condoms and IUD’S.
Breached or Compromised Surfaces Wound care treatments for ulcer, burn and granulation tissue Dressings or Healing devices and Occlusive patches.
External Communicating Device Blood path indirect IV sets, Blood administration sets, accessory tubings, Hemodialysis tubings.
Tissue/ Bone/ Dentin Communicating Laparoscopes, Arthroscopes, Draining systems, Dental cements, Dental filling materials, Skin staples. This category also includes devices which contact internal tissues (rather than blood contact devices). Surgical instruments and accessories.
Circulating Blood Intravascular catheters, Temporary pacemaker electrodes, Oxygenators, Extracorporeal oxygenator tubing and accessories, Hemoadsorbents and Immunoabsorbents.
Implant Device Tissue/ Bone Intraocular lens, Orthopedic pins, plates, screws and accessories, Replacement joints, Bone prostheses, Cements and Intraosseous devices, Pacemakers, Drug supply devices, Neuromuscular sensors and stimulators, Replacement tendons, Breast implants, Artificial larynxes, Subperiosteal implants, Ligation clips.
Blood Cardiac stents, Pacemaker electrodes, Artificial arteriovenous fistulae, Heart valves, Vascular grafts and stents, Internal drug delivery catheters, and Ventricular assist devices.

 

CLASSIFICATION OF DEVICE BASED ON DURATION OF CONTACT
Classification Duration Of Contact
A Less than 24 hours
B 1 day to 30 days
C More than 30 days

.

Page  1  :  2  :  3  :  4  :  5  :  6  :  7  :  8

Back | Back to Top | Previous | Next