Invited Speakers & Panel Experts : Presentation Abstracts
|
Dr. T. S. Kumaravel
Founder Chairman,
GLR Laboratories Pvt. Ltd.,
Chennai
“Biocompatibility Testing
Of Medical Devices: Selection Of Appropriate Tests
From The Manufacturer's Perspective”
Biocompatibility testing of medical devices is very
crucial to determine the safety of medical devices and
gives a long-term business advantage. From the
regulatory perspective, submissions for approval of
medical devices by regulatory agencies require that
biocompatibility assessment be conducted to assure
safety of the device or material. Safety data can be
obtained by testing according to certain prescribed or
recommended guidelines, including guidance documents
developed by the International Organization for
Standardization (ISO) and FDA. These guidelines
include ISO10993, "Biological Evaluation of Medical
Devices," and the guidance document released by FDA in
1995, blue book memorandum #G95-1, "Use of
International Standard ISO10993, 'Biological
Evaluation of Medical Devices'-Part 1: Evaluation and
Testing.", with further draft versions in 2013.
Selection of tests for biocompatibility testing is
defined in the ISO10993 standard. Some tests such as
intracutaneous test, acute systemic toxicity test, and
hemolysis are very straight forward. However, there is
ambiguity with other tests such as sensitization,
hemocompatibility, cytotoxicity, implantation and
genetic toxicology.
There
is a range of tests options available for
sensitization - GPMT, Beuhlers, LLNA. Different
regulators prefer different tests, depending on the
type of devices. Selection of appropriate
sensitization test is important. Similarly,
cytotoxicity has a range of options for cell lines and
endpoints. Hemocompatibility tests are very ill
defined and genetic toxicology requires an appropriate
battery of tests. For implantation tests there are
various options in terms of site of implantation,
duration implantation and choice of animal models.
Manufacturers have always found selection of
appropriate biocompatibility tests challenging. |
|
Dr. V. K. Tikku
Technical Advisor,
Apar Industries Ltd., Valsad
“Electron Beam Accelerators : Technology For The
Sterilization Of Medical Devices”
Developments in Electron Beam technology have led to
its increased use in the sterilization of
medico-surgical equipments and medical products. This
can be accomplished by bombarding the
equipment/products with a beam of energetic electrons
from an Electron Accelerator. The Apar Industries ltd
has set up the Electron Accelerator facility in
Khatalwada, Dist Valsad and is being used for
sterilization of medical products besides other
applications. This is the only facility in the whole
of Western India. The advantages of Electron beam are
that it is a flexible and fast process compared to
other methods and can be accomplished in the finished
packed condition. |
|
Dr. Samuel JK Abraham,
II Dept. of Surgery,
Yamanashi Medical University, Japan |
|
Mr. Hisayuki Furuki
Executive Director,
Medius Solutions Co. Ltd., Japan |
“Product Reference Codes And Unique
Device Identifier: Japan Experience And Potential
Benefits For Indian Healthcare”
Background: Lack of a harmonized UID for each medical
consumable from the manufacturer to end user, i.e the
hospitals across channel partners such as importers,
dealers, distributors and thereafter within the same
hospital or group of hospitals, various departments
viz., main store, sub-store, billing, pharmacy etc.,
leads to several confusions such as duplication of the
master data, mishandling with ordering, delivery or
billing. After the products usage, the insurance
reimbursement mandates specific norms and then, during
the follow-up if there is an incident, it’s reporting
and a recall when instructed by the regulatory agency
will be smooth with a UID. |
Experience in Japan: Medius Solution developed the
system named “Meccul” taking seven years in Japan.
Meccul has a search portal which brings to every stake
holders desk top, the entire list of products and when
integrated with the Hospital Management System, it
avoids the cumbersome task of creating and updating
the master data. The Meccul system in 2007 had only 12
hospitals and now has 3000 hospitals as clients with
600 manufacturers enrolled and 400000 items listed.
Potential Benefits: Similar system if developed and
implemented in India, it will not only avoid the need
of each hospital to have their own master data and its
constant updating but also will help the manufacturers
with easy reach of their product information to the
end users, avoid communication errors throughout the
supply chain enabling an error free, faster and
efficient planning of logistics, delivery, in-house
inventory management and traceability ultimately
adding to patient safety. |
Page
1 :
2 :
3 :
4 :
5 :
6 :
7 :
8 :
9 :
10 :
11 :
12 |