Regulatory Compliance For Medical Device Component
Manufacturers
Medical Devices have
many forms of part or component inputs.
1. There are components which are
assembled to make a device. Each component, though not a
device by itself has an important, if not a critical role
to play. The components are used in the device as such or
sometimes treated.
So we can realize the importance of
maintaining their quality. In today’s world of GMP, GLP,
GDP it becomes critical that their manufacturers follow
basic good manufacturing practice, test them using good
laboratory practices and even transport or distribute them
taking care that they are not damaged during transit, so
good distribution practices.
2. There are components supplied as sub
assembly. This means some of the components are assembled
at the premises of their supplier to form a particular
part of a medical device as an integral part. They need to
follow same fundamental care because again most of these
subassemblies are put together without much treatment or
process of full cleaning and quality.
3. Sometimes medical devices are bulk
supplied as non-sterile components. They are finally
sterilized and packed at the manufacturer and supplier of
medical devices.
From few of the above examples and
comparison to medicines it becomes very clear that
performance, safety and criticality of use (usability) of
medical device is largely dependent on components and in
most of the cases of manufacturer there are multiple part
suppliers. These parts are assembled and if need be
sterilized at the final manufacturer.
Thus consistency of the product quality
and performance is dependent on component manufacturers as
much as final device manufacturers.
Thus like API manufacturers are part of
regulated industry there should be basic and minimum
compliance responsibility and regulations should be for
the component manufacturers.
Let us examine what it can be. As
described earlier GMP and GLP as well as GDP becomes core
of the regulatory need. What does it mean and what are the
standards that can control them?
International standardization on
Quality Management System has published ISO 13485 standard
and the same is adopted by international community like US
FDA under their 21CFR, European Union and MDSAP as EN ISO
13485. India was late to regulate medical devices and
still made a beginning. We have taken as usual a very
thoughtful and planned route, though belated, with minimum
System requirements based on ISO 13485.
The supplier qualification and if
required audit has been now widely recommended, even
insisted upon. Especially if component supplier is not
following audited QMS they need to be audited and approved
by the final manufacturer of medical devices.
Thus supplier evaluation, qualification
and approval have to be an integral part of the
manufacturer’s QMS. Again like GMP in pharmaceutical
industry; it is not a onetime exercise but should be
followed at a planned interval. The requirements also
should be clearly stated in the agreement between
component manufacturer/supplier and final device
manufacturer. Any changes in the specifications,
composition of the component/part should need a prior
approval. Major or minor non-compliance of the System need
to be addressed and communicated / reported to the
manufacturer of the device in a time bound manner.
Traceability from raw material used to the component
manufactured is required. Thus a system is required with
documentation and records.
What is the title of ISO 13485 and
where does it specify need to control components?
ISO 13485:2016 - Medical devices
- Quality management systems
- Requirements for regulatory
purposes What does introduction of this standard says
about its application to:
“The requirements in this International
Standard can also be used by suppliers or other external
parties providing product (e.g. raw materials, components,
subassemblies, medical devices, sterilization services,
calibration services, distribution services.”
Further it states that - “Several
jurisdictions have regulatory requirements for the
application of quality management systems by organizations
with a variety of roles in the supply chain for medical
devices.”
Though these are non-binding guidelines
flowing clauses of the standard are more specific:
Clause 7.4.1 from the standard I quoted
here. Its requirements can be expanded subsequently.
Underlined information is from the author of this article.
7.4.1 Purchasing process: The
organization shall document procedures (see 4.2.4) to
ensure that purchased product conforms to specified
purchasing information. The organization shall establish
criteria for the evaluation and selection of suppliers.
The criteria shall be: a) based on the supplier’s ability
to provide product that meets the organization’s
requirements; b) based on the performance of the supplier;
c) based on the effect of the purchased product on the
quality of the medical device; d) proportionate to the
risk associated with the medical device. The organization
shall plan the monitoring and re-evaluation of suppliers.
Supplier performance in meeting requirements for the
purchased product shall be monitored. The results of the
monitoring shall provide an input into the supplier
re-evaluation process. Non-fulfillment of purchasing
requirements shall be addressed with the supplier
proportionate to the risk associated with the purchased
product and compliance with applicable regulatory
requirements.”
The product standard
compliances are a different but critical aspect and at
least risk based approach and biocompatibility
requirements as per ISO 10993-1 should be adhered to by
the component manufacturer.
Conclusion: From
above points, a broad requirement emerges which becomes
specific based on the criticality and risk of the device.
It is in the interest
of component manufacturer, device manufacturer and above
all user patients, that risk based regulations using
Quality Management System (QMS) principles are a must for
all aspects of medical device manufacturing including
component manufacturers/suppliers. Why all these
discussions now? See the increase in the use of and
expansion of the medical device industry. The global
medical device market is predicted to reach $440 billion
as per 1988 predictions, growing at a rate of about 4.4
per cent per year. Compare this with the anticipated
growth of the prescription drug market – an annual rate of
2.5 per cent.
|