Dr. T. S. Kumarvel
Founder Chairman,
GLR Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Chennai
Considering the
necessity of a strong regulatory system for medical
devices, in particular, the government is working on a
war foot to upgrade our systems to become globally
visible and provide quality medical devices.
Hopefully, the introduction of the Medical Device
Rules, 2017 may provide some relief to this burning
issue.
|
Evolution is a
slow process and so is our medical device industry and
its regulation. We are evolving! and
hope it’s for the sake of good. Well, that’s an
optimistic way of establishing the fact that we have
taken too long to roll up our sleeves, as far as
medical devices are concerned. This article is a quick
look at the metamorphosis of the Indian medical device
regulations, the past, the present and what the future
holds.
India, the fourth largest medical
devices market in Asia is estimated to demonstrate a
growth of a whopping $50 billion by 2025. This shows
the enormous potential that this sector holds and is
proficiently tapped by the international pharma
giants. India is seen as a key market for the medical
devices and diagnostic products. In a span of seven
years, there has been a spurt of growth in the Indian
medical device market with a compound annual growth
rate of 15.8%. However, unlike the rest of the world,
lack of stringent regulations made it easy for the big
manufacturers to market their products in India. This
is one reason why nearly 75% of the medical devices
marketed in India are imported hands down.
Are all these imported devices safe
and of good quality? Now, that’s a million-dollar
question. About 4700 Indian patients received faulty
hip implants supplied by one of
the famous pharma giants even after it was recalled in
other countries in 2010. What was reported as a
massive failure, earned a huge amount of money in
India. How could this even happen? Are we being
treated as guinea pigs? And what happened to the moral
responsibility of the manufacturer? Well, the answer
clearly lies in the lack of defined regulations in
India for handling medical device failures with no
legal provisions for compensating patients. The
rise in the number of serious adverse events related
to medical devices from 40 in 2014 to 556 in 2018,
shows the negligence by the ministry and the handicap
of our regulations in this industry. As of now,
there is no system in India for handling compensations
for injured or dying patients due to a faulty medical
device. However, according to a recent DTAB meeting,
proposals are on the way to insist the manufacturing
or importing companies that supplies the faulty
product, to pay the compensation to the patient’s or
their family. As per the proposal, the vindictive
pharma company which supplied the faulty hip implants
was insisted to pay a lump sum of ¹ 2 million to each
patient as compensation.
Considering the necessity of a
strong regulatory system for medical devices, in
particular, the government is working on a war foot to
upgrade our systems to become globally visible and
provide quality medical devices. Hopefully, the
introduction of the Medical Device Rules, 2017 may
provide some relief to this burning issue. This
critical document, which was drafted way back in 2006,
was released in 2017 and was in effect from January
2018. The reason for this delay could have been the
change in the government and all the political
bureaucracies. Finally, there is this 241-page
document which really has some meaningful rules to
regulate medical devices in India. The remarkable part
being that, it has been framed based on international
standards (Global Harmonized Task Force standards), so
it will certainly have an impact on the quality of the
medical devices and their acceptance in the
international forum. A critical component of this
regulatory compliance is that, it monitors the adverse
events and reports them. This is now being managed
through the Materiovigilance Programme of India which
was launched in 2015.
Will MDR 2017 can help in dealing
with corporate misconducts? Well, the Indian
regulations for medical devices is slowly being
streamlined. Earlier only 23 of the many devices
marketed in India were regulated. The Drugs Technical
Advisory Board in its recent meeting, added some more
devices including, all implantable medical devices,
bone marrow cell separators, defibrillators, dialysis
machines, CT scan equipment, MRI equipment, PET
equipment, X-ray machines. The CDSCO, which is the
apex body, aims to make this addition a dynamic
process and all manufacturers are advised to be on the
lookout if their devices are listed. If a medical
device that has already been marketed in India is
added to this list of regulated devices, the applicant
needs to provide evidences of safety, performance
and effectiveness.
According to the MDR 2017,
medical devices are classified into A, B, C and D,
where A and B are low risk devices, C and D are high
risk devices. The state licensing authority shall be
the issuing authority for the A and B class of
devices, while the Central licensing authority issues
license for the C and D class devices. An amendment to
the MDR 2017 rules was made to accommodate this
device-class specific issuance of licenses. Also, the
fee (Rs. 1000/-) has been applied to each category of
the medical device instead of each distinct device.
This would add up to the cost for registration of
devices that have multiple components falling under
different categories. In contrast to the rest of the
world, where, the manufacturer classifies his device
according to the nature of contact and contact
duration, in India, the regulatory body would classify
the device based on its intended use, invasiveness,
duration of contact, presence of a therapeutic
component, presence of medicinal product/biological
derivatives. In addition, the accessories would be
classified separately from the main device. In a
combination device, the rule would apply for each
individual device. |