A TECHNO-ECONOMIC NEWS MAGAZINE FOR MEDICAL PLASTICS AND PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY
Our 14th Year of Publication
Page  3 of 3

Cover Story

Sterilisation

In India, manufacturers have continued to employ two standard sterilization processes for the majority of medical devices processed worldwide: gamma and ethylene-oxide (EtO) gas diffusion.

EtO, the oldest of the technologies, continues to flourish as a robust and flexible 21st-century method of industrial sterilization of medical devices.

New regulations

Although the highly reactive nature of the EtO molecule (epoxy ring molecule) offers an excellent method of sterilisation, it also presents a significant number of regulatory challenges. There are currently two International Organisation for Standardisation (ISO) standards that are in the process of being changed. These changes will affect the sterilisation of medical devices using EtO gas.

Medical devices used for short-term duration (24 hours) will need to conform to significantly reduce residual criteria prior to release for patient use. Without significant changes to the sterilisation process or ventilation of the packaging, the medical device manufacturer can expect an extension to product quarantine time pending the necessary EtO residual levels being met.

Planning Ahead

From a manufacturer's perspective, it is critical to prioritize the most important needs and to articulate those to the contract manufacturer. To be successful, both device companies and contract manufacturers will become increasingly focused on anticipating market needs.

Following questions should help medical device companies find common ground with their outsourcing partners for mutually beneficial collaborations:

  • What is your company's specialty area (e.g., cardiology, dialysis, anesthesia, home healthcare, etc.)?

  • Is the device to be developed or manufactured Class I, Class II, or Class III? The class affects the device's development, regulatory pathway, financial liability, and complexities.

  • What gaps do you need your partners to fill (e.g., engineering resources, distribution, packaging, or finished-device manufacturing) awaiting?

  • Is the quality system of the contract manufacturer sufficient for the device being manufactured? Both the contract manufacturer and medical device company should do a gap analysis of their quality systems. Mutually agreeing on what needs to be included in the quality system of the contract manufacturer should be done before manufacturing begins.

  • How will the transfer of developed products to manufactured products be managed? Using one company for development and another for manufacturing can complicate the process and can increase time to market. It is important to ensure that engineering designs created in the development phase support designs for manufacturability.

  • What are the current and expected national and global demands for the finished device? If demand is expected to increase, then device companies should request year-over-year pricing decreases. However, if demand is expected to fall, be prepared that a contract manufacturer may expect year-over-year volume commitments.

  • What are the current and expected average selling prices (ASPs) for the finished devices? (Low ASPs generally equate to high-volume production.) Does the contract manufacturer have access to low-cost manufacturing?

Page 1  2  3

* * * * *

Back | Back to Top |Previous